Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 20:12:15 +0100 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: le@put.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pine Ports Message-ID: <17001.832446735@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 18 May 1996 14:50:34 EDT." <Pine.OSF.3.91.960518144957.7980A-100000@gilligan.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Robey wrote in message ID <Pine.OSF.3.91.960518144957.7980A-100000@gilligan.eng.umd.edu>: > On Sat, 18 May 1996 le@put.com wrote: > > > Any particular reason 3.91 is still the current Pine port? > > Are the changes in 3.93 insignificant? > > It's there because no one has yet volunteered to upgrade it. Could you? Wrong actually. There is a ``change-request'' PR open at the minute for a 3.93 version of pine (upgrade included). I got poked about it yesterday on IRC. PR 1168 I think offhand. I'm going to leave the commit to Satoshi tho, as he can get to thud a lot easier than I can. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17001.832446735>