Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 21:52:56 -0500 From: Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CLang version was 3.3 and 3.4 in ports ... Message-ID: <CA%2BWntOuSYXzocO1eUVxCa7rZZz0EykkyMukBH_8vX9PAYbMXXw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131104000554.GB46135@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <CA%2BWntOvFv0nQqybM1kRaBxWrC-EzbNwAZP1cFX8WiMHGHdF2tg@mail.gmail.com> <20131104000554.GB46135@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes and thanks. On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:57:07PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: > > Since /usr/ports/UPDATING refers to 3.4, will that be added to the > /usr/$BASE ? > > Also, is it svn ot other to checkout the developmental version of > > clang et al && what version are those? I'll probably get most of my > > answers researching after I send this mail. > > Apologies for any static. > > Are you referring to the 20131008 entry? I'm pretty sure it is a typo > that it mentions "clang > 3.3". The code looks for a clang version of > at least 3.3. > > We do plan to update clang to 3.4 once it's out since that will vastly > improve lldb support among other things. 10.0 will certainly ship with > 3.3. > > -- Brooks >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BWntOuSYXzocO1eUVxCa7rZZz0EykkyMukBH_8vX9PAYbMXXw>