Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:04:35 -0500 From: "Garance A Drosehn" <drosih@rpi.edu> To: "Dmitry Morozovsky" <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: gad@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mtree patch for WITHOUT_LPR Message-ID: <83EBC2D5-D4A1-4D5E-8538-A536C8A8500C@rpi.edu> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1511071404560.6619@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1511071404560.6619@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Nov 2015, at 6:08, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > as you're still maintaining lpr, I'm passing this through you. > > If one build his server WITHOUT_LPR, there are constantly few > directories that > are created by make hierarchy and then reported my make check-old. > > Attached is a small patch against -current that should eliminate it > (inspired > by BSD.groff.mtree). > > Your thoughts? Thanks for checking with me. While I've done a lot with 'lpr', I have not done much of anything with mtree files. After having read through the rest of this thread, I have the impression that we're no longer interested in a separate mtree subfile for 'lpr'. Instead we'll go with Brian's observation that: "if a directory is in the dist mtrees, it should not be listed as an OLD_DIRS." Am I correct in thinking that? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosih@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?83EBC2D5-D4A1-4D5E-8538-A536C8A8500C>