Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 02:11:58 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include/arpa inet.h src/sys/netinet in.h src Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103250205180.29136-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20010324.232141.03996757.ume@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 23:33:11 -0800 (PST) > >>>>> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> said: > > jhb> It seems i386 is evil and doesn't use in_addr_t or in_port_t in its > jhb> machine/endian.h. This probably breaks ia64 as well. Will you move in_port_t > jhb> into sys/types.h as well and then convert the i386 endian.h to use the right > jhb> types? > > Why is there definition of in_addr_t only in alpha? I believe it's > MI. The alpha version was obtained from NetBSD, but the i386 version was obtained from 386BSD (via FreeBSD-1.1). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0103250205180.29136-100000>