Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:39:23 +0100 From: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_W=B1sikowski?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison Message-ID: <CA%2BD9QhtFkfx8_DrSgkHHvJB4AmN_Vhpt-7-DY6p0z6AMmAuCKg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net> References: <CADfWLe=zOc2CYRXf8ZuG4uZqN%2BMBck4y1JoDcmrX--JqAgDSQw@mail.gmail.com> <52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
And lets not forget the head start vmware has (bhyve is what? 1-2 years old?) and the size of it. Less then 1mb in code. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, =C5=81ukasz W=C4=85sikowski <lukasz@wasikowski.net>wrote: > W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: > > > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe yo= u > > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t := -) > > > > > http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-= 5-comparison/ > > > > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! > > > > Thanks for your time. > > You've wrote: > > > BHyVe took 332 seconds > VMWare took 313 seconds > > The difference is about 106.7%. > > I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's > time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it > should be 6,41% really :) > > -- > best regards, > Lukasz Wasikowski > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BD9QhtFkfx8_DrSgkHHvJB4AmN_Vhpt-7-DY6p0z6AMmAuCKg>