Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 16:11:02 -0400 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" <stephane.potvin@iml-cti.com> To: "Samuel Tardieu" <sam@inf.enst.fr> Cc: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: buildworld broken in sys/boot/i386/btx/btx Message-ID: <NEBBLCPGKMCJNIKIBGGNOEFGCCAA.stephane.potvin@iml-cti.com> In-Reply-To: <2000-05-22-22-01-36%2Btrackit%2Bsam@inf.enst.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Samuel Tardieu > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 4:02 PM > To: Stephane E. Potvin > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: buildworld broken in sys/boot/i386/btx/btx > > > On 22/05, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > > | Try applying the patches in the following PR. I'm not sure they > will still > | apply cleanly but it should fix your problem. > > They don't apply cleanly, and I have to leave. But I would rather > understand > why there is a failure in the first place, and why other people > seem not to > encounter it :/ > They have to do with the fact that the newest binutils is much more pedantic than it used to be with opcodes vs operands size. > Thanks anyway for the pointer. > You're welcome :) -- Stephane E. Potvin InnoMediaLogic Inc. -- http://www.multichassis.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NEBBLCPGKMCJNIKIBGGNOEFGCCAA.stephane.potvin>