Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:51:07 +0300 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Dmitrij Tejblum <dt@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libkvm kvm_getswapinfo.c Message-ID: <199902150851.LAA00915@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Feb 1999 23:35:23 PST." <199902150735.XAA13248@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > :dt 1999/02/14 13:42:06 PST > : > : Modified files: > : lib/libkvm kvm_getswapinfo.c > : Log: > : From rev. 1.12 of usr.sbin/pstat/pstat.c by phk: > : Reflect the fact that we do not swap on the first <dmmax> blocks of a > : swapdev, to protect disklabels and other such magic stuff. > : > : Revision Changes Path > : 1.6 +6 -3 src/lib/libkvm/kvm_getswapinfo.c > > Hmm. I considered this but figured that it made more sense for > the reserved blocks to show up as allocated swap so the totals > would come out right. I like to see "0K swap used" and know that the system is not yet paging. I think "allocated swap" should mean "allocated for paging". It make some sense, and it worked this way for years... Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902150851.LAA00915>