Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:00:26 -0500 From: "Jeff Hinrichs" <jlh@cox.net> To: "Dick Davies" <rasputnik@hellooperator.net>, "Marius Kirschner" <marius@agoron.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Moving to apache2 Message-ID: <096a01c427fc$d160f250$6702a8c0@gato> References: <20040420190416.GA7769@lb.tenfour><20040420191218.E40D243D55@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20040420194756.GB7769@lb.tenfour>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick Davies" <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> To: "Marius Kirschner" <marius@agoron.net> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: Re: Moving to apache2 > * Marius Kirschner <marius@agoron.net> [0413 20:13]: > > So in order ensure the most backward compatibility it's better to stick with > > 1.39? > > It depends what you use. mod_ruby, mod_php4, mod_perl and mod_fastcgi are ok. > mod_dav and mod_ssl are now builtins. That's all I use. > > You don't gain an awful lot from 2, I just wanted it for SubVersion, which > isn't available for apache 1.3. > > Don't know about python, you'd have to check. mod_python is good, v3.1.3 in fact. -Jeff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?096a01c427fc$d160f250$6702a8c0>