Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, not on list - please copy <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost 
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10210041700010.4892-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <81528.1033764474@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <Pine.GSO.4.10.10210041624510.654-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, Daniel E
> ischen writes:
> >On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210041242410.17529-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
> >> lian Elischer writes:
> >> 
> >> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
> >> >responsibility to make older subsystems work.
> >> 
> >> I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that:
> >> 
> >> When will you have made KSE work on sparc64 and ia64 ?
> >
> >Those are Tier2 platforms :-)
> 
> And ?  Vinum is a tier2 feature.

I make no judgement about vinum.  Just the comment about
KSE working on sparc64 and ia64.

-- 
Dan Eischen


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10210041700010.4892-100000>