Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:41:38 -0400 From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@trigger.net> To: "Sheldon Hearn" <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: buildworld failure Message-ID: <JCEIKJMCANNPGKFKGLKLAEFJDMAA.mikej@trigger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030829153620.GM5234@starjuice.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:36 AM > To: Mike Jakubik > Cc: Current > Subject: Re: buildworld failure > > > On (2003/08/29 11:30), Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > Why should I have to turn off all my optimization options when building > > world? > > Because it's not working? Mind you, it's only -O2 that you're > recommended to turn off; -O works fine. Yes, I can see that its not working. But this is a solution to the cause, not the problem. Shouldn't this be fixed? > > This shouldn't be like that. 4.x always compiled fine with -O2 and > > CPU options. > > Okay, you philosophize while the rest of us follow the advice of the > folks who have a good understanding of gcc's optimizer. :-) Are you saying this is a bug in GCC and not the PAM code?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?JCEIKJMCANNPGKFKGLKLAEFJDMAA.mikej>