Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:00:28 +1000 From: Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's backwards webdesign / corporate identity Message-ID: <4F82269C.2030701@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20120408224447.692a9e2a@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <CADnJ0kHO%2B5dzNZdBCWjH=nmKK=WROUhm%2Bz0vAsn62cdFB3zzrA@mail.gmail.com> <20120408224447.692a9e2a@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/09/12 07:44, RW wrote: > On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:40:12 +0200 > Tony wrote: > >> Tony >> http://siegelgale.com/ > The FreeBSD site isn't great, but this site is worse. > > Has no-one ever pointed-out the irony that the top 20% of the page > bangs-on about simplifying, and has a "fight bloat on your website" > link, but the other 80% is a cluttered mess. > > It also has a pet hate of mine: menus that make the rest of the page > move around even when the pointer is just passing-over them. I can > forgive the FreeBSD site all its faults for not doing that. > The FreeBSD site is accessible (as is legal required) and to the point. That is what matters. It provides all the information needed and communicates it exceedingly well. FreeBSD is a no nonsense get the job done without bloat OS: the site communicates that as well, and communication is not just about the words. My 2c.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F82269C.2030701>