Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:40:13 -0500
From:      Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com>
To:        Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mbuf cache
Message-ID:  <20030307104013.A18824@unixdaemons.com>
In-Reply-To: <008101c2e4ba$53d875a0$932a40c1@PHE>; from pete@he.iki.fi on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:00:42PM %2B0200
References:  <20030304164449.A10136@unixdaemons.com> <0e1b01c2e29c$d1fefdc0$932a40c1@PHE> <20030304173809.A10373@unixdaemons.com> <0e2b01c2e2a3$96fd3b40$932a40c1@PHE> <20030304182133.A10561@unixdaemons.com> <0e3701c2e2a7$aaa2b180$932a40c1@PHE> <20030304190851.A10853@unixdaemons.com> <001201c2e2ee$54eedfb0$932a40c1@PHE> <20030307093736.A18611@unixdaemons.com> <008101c2e4ba$53d875a0$932a40c1@PHE>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:00:42PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
> >   There's probably a tightloop of frees going on somewhere.  It's tough
> >   for me to analyze this as I cannot reproduce it.  Have you tried
> >   running your tests over loopback to see if the same thing happens?
> 
> What is the definition of "tightloop"? The received packet mbufs are freed
> when the packets get processed/discarded which happens once for
> a packet. The received packet rate is 50000-150000 packets per second.
> > 
> >   If so, and it does, can you please explain how to exactly replicate
> >   the test?
> 
> Mirror a port with ~300-800Mbps of IP traffic to an em port. Just enable
> promisc and monitor so it drops the packets after interrupt processing.
> The overhead beyond that is neglible compared to mb_free.
> 
> Pete

  Ok I have a patch that makes mb_free() a lot smaller by moving out
  everything not in the common case to seperate functions.  I'm going to
  wait until I get home to give it a test run before I send it to you.
  At least this way you'll be able to profile again and tell me whether
  it's really the common case of mb_free() that's being expensive or if
  you're often hitting non-common-cases (in which case the auxilary
  routines should register the higher CPU usage).

-- 
Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@unixdaemons.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030307104013.A18824>