Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:25:12 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <200007270625.AAA36358@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:36:13 PDT." <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com> References: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com> John Polstra writes: : I am building a bike shed, and I was wondering if you could advise : me about what color it should be. :-) 'Blue, no green' : What do you folks think about this? I see two types of system on a regular basis. One is where you are running stock everything and writable anything is a big problem. The other is where I'm developing things all over the place and want shared libaries to be writable or at least the dirs they are in. Sometimes I'll want to further have ldconfig these dirs too. So, my suggestion would be to have -S option. That way people that want to have extra high security can have it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007270625.AAA36358>