Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:36:22 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: traffic shaping on RELENG_10 ? Message-ID: <56730EB6.9020507@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <20151217192433.GA12383@mithlond.kdm.org> References: <5671C78A.4030807@sentex.net> <20151217192433.GA12383@mithlond.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/17/2015 2:24 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > It took me a while to get ALTQ working. More below.. Thank you very much for the detail! Are you running any patches ? I seem to recall over the years the pfsense folks with patches to pf to get it to play well. However, I dont know if thats relevant to RELENG_10 or not. I wonder if there is a similar issue with the re driver and altq. I tried to get it to work on the old zoo and never once was able to shape a packet :( In my case, I just want to prevent a process from eating up bandwidth by accident so dummynet does the trick just fine. I am going to try this new box with em nics and see if I can get altq to work. It would be nice if its in one config file and I dont have to have multiple firewall systems. Just curious, since you had altq working, why did you not want to just use pf for your firewall rules and natting ? ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56730EB6.9020507>