Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:01:45 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: Stefan Esser <se@zpr.uni-koeln.de>, Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/print/ghostscript4 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.960731000038.338B-100000@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960730170534.18093B-100000@fiber.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Jul 1996, Chuck Robey wrote: > I'm not sure I agree with this. The old tar file is very likely to > become much harder to get, and keeping parts of older versions, to > balance off ftp loading time, well, I think this isn't wise. I think it > would just cause much more confusion than the time saved, for the largest > number of people. I think this might be a strong argument to use actual version numbers. -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.960731000038.338B-100000>