Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:32:42 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>, Pengfei Ju <jupengfei@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ports/142880: [REPOCOPY] chinese/stardict2-dict-zh_CN --- Message-ID: <64268821@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <7be7a2801001181801t509e672dw937b3b1630f67d99@mail.gmail.com> (wen heping's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:01:35 %2B0800") References: <201001182230.o0IMU9ua038362@freefall.freebsd.org> <7be7a2801001181801t509e672dw937b3b1630f67d99@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:01:35 +0800 wen heping wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Wouldn 't=20 better to remove run dependency on stardict and allow people > > to use existing port for any of stardict 2/3 (or other -- not only stardict > > can use these dictionaries.) Yep, those dictionaries may be used by other ports. There is for example textproc/goldendict which is happy with those dictionaries. > Yes, it is better than to create a new port. :) > But how do you think about this way: > 1 REPOCOPY stardict2-dict-zh_CN--> stardict-dict-zh_CN > 2 Add option entry for stardict2 or stardict3 ? ...and an option for goldendict, please! ;-) -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64268821>