Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:40:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/58250: [new port] www/mod_ntlm2: Implements NTLM authentication for Apache 2.0.x. Message-ID: <200310221540.h9MFeH5l023000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/58250; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> To: sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/58250: [new port] www/mod_ntlm2: Implements NTLM authentication for Apache 2.0.x. Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:57:36 +0200 (CEST) In article <20031019193453.CCF8D43F75@mx1.FreeBSD.org> you write: > >Number: 58250 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: [new port] www/mod_ntlm2: Implements NTLM > authentication for Apache 2.0.x. This has an ambiguous and incomplete license. I don't know what it is with these people writing apache modules. Why can't they just pick a standard license, e.g. the apache one? We're not allowed to modify it. Possibly we're not allowed to charge for distribution, i.e. we can't put it on CD. Overall, I think RESTRICTED is safest. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310221540.h9MFeH5l023000>