Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT) From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/30336: archivers/bzip2: only install symlinks if OSVERSION >= 4.3.2 Message-ID: <200109080740.f887e2L22397@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/30336; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/30336: archivers/bzip2: only install symlinks if OSVERSION >= 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 16:36:20 +0900 At Sat, 8 Sep 2001 08:55:48 +0200 (CEST), Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > no, it can't be marked broken since too many ports rely on it. > > grep -c /usr/ports/INDEX > -> 526 You counted what? When and on what version of FreeBSD did you produce the INDEX you grepped? With the latest INDEX, I can see this: knu@archon[2]% grep bzip2-1 /usr/ports/INDEX bzip2-1.0.1|/usr/ports/archivers/bzip2|/usr/local|A block-sorting file compressor|/usr/ports/archivers/bzip2/pkg-descr|ports@FreeBSD.org|archivers|||http://sourceware.cygnus.com/bzip2/ knu@archon[2]% > maybe the symlinks aren't needed, but nobody can be sure. all ports > depending directly or indirectly on it should be checked first... > are you willing to do the job ? because, I'm not ;^) I've checked already. I removed all the bzip2 dependency from ports and the package building for the 4.4-RELEASE was done without a problem regarding bzip2. -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "Freeze this moment a little bit longer, make each impression a little bit stronger.. Experience slips away -- Time stand still" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109080740.f887e2L22397>