Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:03:59 +0200 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <20000727090359.A71137@ywing.creative.net.au> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>; from jdp@polstra.com on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700 References: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000, John Polstra wrote: > I am building a bike shed, and I was wondering if you could advise > me about what color it should be. :-) [snip] > 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line > option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added > to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > > What do you folks think about this? Hrm. If you change the default behaviour, POLA might kick in. Not that I mind. I agree with the above changes, with or without POLA considerations. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd Now 17-year-olds can't play a _video game_ <adrian@FreeBSD.org> because its called violent - and real violence is still called dinner. -- jamie@mccarthy.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000727090359.A71137>