Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:50:59 +0100 From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, imp@freebsd.org, Iang <iang@iang.org> Subject: Re: strange limitation on rcmd() Message-ID: <20060710175059.GA2325@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <200607101147.34530@aldan> References: <200607072030.01999.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <44B25F0A.5040709@iang.org> <20060710141729.GF1101@zaphod.nitro.dk> <200607101147.34530@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:47:33AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > What I remain upset about, though, is that the rcmdsh(), which is used by > rcmd() ignores the fd2p parameter making it impossible to capture the > remote's stderr... Well, it's probably worth send-pr'ing it. I'd first test whether rsh itself forwards stderr properly. Maybe there's some underlying reason why rcmdsh doesn't have an fd2p argument.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060710175059.GA2325>