Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:25:08 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        ache@nagual.ru (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=)
Cc:        jkh@FreeBSD.org, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 'fetch' fixes to conform HTTP standard
Message-ID:  <199606241125.NAA09868@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <199606240626.KAA00346@nagual.ru> from "[______ ______]" at "Jun 24, 96 10:26:37 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that [______ ______] said:
>   		    return;
> ! 		if (match (".*200.*success", s) == 0) {
>   			/* maybe not found, or document w/o header */
>   			if (match (".*404.*not found", s)) {
>   				fprintf (stderr, "%s not found\n%s\n", file_to_get, s);
> --- 539,545 ----
>   		s[header_len] = 0;
>   		if (len && (header_len < S))
>   		    return;
> ! 		if (match (".*200 +OK", s) == 0) {
>   			/* maybe not found, or document w/o header */

I don't think it    is wise to  try  to  match  anything after  the  return
number. You could put "200 foo bar" and still  conform to the RFC. Anything
after the code should be ignored IMO.
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT    -=- The daemon is FREE! -=-    roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #11: Thu Jun 13 11:01:47 MET DST 1996



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606241125.NAA09868>