Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jan 1996 09:17:51 +1030 (CST)
From:      michael smith <miff@spam.frisbee.net.au>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: location of bad144 table
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960116091553.20117C-100000@lovely>
In-Reply-To: <199601151922.GAA06374@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Bruce Evans wrote:

> In FreeBSD >2.0.5., the end of the disk (according to d_secperunit) is
> used in all places (except in the bad144 man page :-().  This is
> not fully compatible with the DEC standard 144, but the "last track"
> is too slippery to use if the geometry is translated or the number
> of sectors/track is variable.

It would appear that the bad144 program still uses the 'c' partition, or
divines the end of the disk in a fashion different from the kernel code.

At least, bad144 runs without a slew of error messages, whilst attempting
to read the disklabel once bad144 has been run results in much unhappiness.

> Bruce

Mike




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960116091553.20117C-100000>