Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:14:03 +1100 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Francisco Reyes <fran@reyes.somos.net> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, James Howard <howardjp@well.com>, netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did NetBSD and FreeBSD diverge? Message-ID: <20010118001403.B10950@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <200101172102.QAA96480@sanson.reyes.somos.net>; from fran@reyes.somos.net on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:36:06PM -0500 References: <20010117175244.A34934@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <200101172102.QAA96480@sanson.reyes.somos.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 17 January 2001 at 15:36:06 -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:52:44 +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > >>> What I never understood is why "officially" they don't coperate more with >>> each other. I believe that unoficially some of the developers >>> work/help/contribute to more than one of the BSDs. >> >> Lots of the developers work on more than one BSD. What would you like >> to see in order to make that 'official'? > > A list, even if minimal, of things which the "architects" (i.e. > core on FreeBSD, don't know it's equivalent on NetBSD) The NetBSD core group. But, like the FreeBSD core team, they're not the architects. The committers are the architects. > agreed to at least consider the other OS. I am not saying they > should consult each other for everything, but they could at least > keep in other in mind that would be great. Well, I agree with Nik that things are getting a lot closer. But I think that the way to come closer together is for the individual subprojects to work together. And I think that's happening. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010118001403.B10950>