Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:14:49 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults devfs.rules Message-ID: <78101.1064596489@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:03:41 PDT." <20030926100145.D64861@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030926100145.D64861@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes: >On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Modified files: >> etc/defaults devfs.rules >> Log: >> As far as we know, there is no reason to not expose /dev/crypto in >> jails so code in there can take advantage of hardware assisted >> crypto. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.2 +1 -0 src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules > >Except for the fact that you don't want to combine access to the TSC and >this paper: > >http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/kocher96timing.html I don't see what that has to do with jailed vs nonjailed use of /dev/crypto ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78101.1064596489>