Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 23:09:26 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pgcc-ports file Message-ID: <19980616230926.C11850@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <19980616215436.01527@cerebro.laendle>; from Marc Lehmann on Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 09:54:36PM %2B0200 References: <19980616215436.01527@cerebro.laendle>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm confused again at the freebsd ports (that never really worked) ;) I just > got a message stating that: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/ports/lang/pgcc-current.tar.gz > http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/packages/lang/pgcc-2.7.2.9.tgz > > Are broken. It seems paths are moved every half a year. > > Do you have any idea what happened? Hi Marc, I removed the pgcc ports. Thought that egcs is the successor. Was wrong, but I was so busy, that I didn't re-invoke it directly. But since there was no high demand on this, I didn't activate the ports again. Now some people seem to want pgcc ... But I don't want to maintain them, because my ISDN costs are already too high (really too high !). So I can't maintain these ``biggies''. Maybe some other people like to maintain pgcc. Another thing is, that I already maintain many ports. And since I have a new job now, figure out ;-) Cc'd to ports. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980616230926.C11850>