Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:02:33 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ), pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.1.20031209190044.02d6c528@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <xzpvfoq2oyi.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:46 09/12/2003 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > I was under impression that only authors of new ports are listed there. > > If someone take existing port, he's not automatically listed there. > >Anyone maintaining a port is most definitely a contributor and should >be listed. Is that an official answer? The last thing I want to do is send emails out to 600+ addresses, collect together the responses, and then have to write back to say "oops, sorry, we can't list you after all". Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20031209190044.02d6c528>