Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:08:16 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jun 7.0-CURRENT AMD64 snapshot Message-ID: <499c70c0706081208n12ca5fc6i5a059dce634ee8f8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070608184730.GA46898@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <499c70c0706080535j69770039y6f524afb39ff08f9@mail.gmail.com> <200706081400.l58E02bh078199@lurza.secnetix.de> <499c70c0706080950w3ca7d5dax7e1aff86dd23283a@mail.gmail.com> <20070608184730.GA46898@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/8/07, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 07:50:52PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > On 6/8/07, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> wrote: > > >Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > > > > > > Where could I get Jun 7.0-CURRENT AMD64 snapshot? > > Or Maybe waiting for Jeff SHCED_SMP to be added? :) > > This is targetted for e.g. 8-core systems, on a 2 cpu system > sched_lock is typically not enough of a problem that you will see > performance improvements from avoiding it. > > Kris > So for 2 cores I should use SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_SMP? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0706081208n12ca5fc6i5a059dce634ee8f8>