Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:29:53 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Niall Smart <niall@pobox.com> Cc: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@Baker.ie>, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, questions@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Various Questions Message-ID: <2225.934453793@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:20:35 GMT." <37B2BC13.ECA642D0@pobox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:20:35 GMT, Niall Smart wrote: > But what happens if you write a program which does whatever ioctl is > required to unpromiscify an interface and run it on an unpromiscuous > interface, does it print a message to syslog even though promiscuous > mode was never enabled in the first place? Like I said, I seem to get the intended behaviour. vty1 -> start trafshow Aug 12 12:26:41 axl /kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode enabled vty2 -> start trafshow vty1 -> kill trafshow vty2 -> kill trafshow Aug 12 12:27:22 axl /kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode disabled :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2225.934453793>