Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:15:51 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r264042 - in head: include lib/libc/gen lib/libc/include lib/libc/stdlib Message-ID: <D0C60099-B542-422F-BAED-E42DE49FAEA5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140404121429.GD85325@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201404021607.s32G7mhw051355@svn.freebsd.org> <20140404115256.GA85137@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <384FF99D-A2CC-4744-8FBB-251773EA0B3C@FreeBSD.org> <20140404121429.GD85325@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 Apr 2014, at 13:14, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:10:24PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 4 Apr 2014, at 12:52, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>=20 >>> This breaks a couple of ports starting with cups, those ports do = expect >>> libdispatch to be available if _BLOCK_ exists. Do you plan to import >>> libdispatch soon? >>=20 >> I've just tried building the print/cups-client port and it builds = correctly for me with base-clang, base-gcc, and ports-gcc47. Can you = provide any more steps to reproduce? >>=20 >> David >>=20 > I have CCed you about this case Thanks. It looks like it's unrelated to this commit, but due to the = earlier addition of blocks support to base-gcc. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D0C60099-B542-422F-BAED-E42DE49FAEA5>