Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 23:09:47 +0000 From: Rob <drifter@stratos.net> To: Jim Mock <jim@corp.au.triax.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fetch -A(?) Message-ID: <19990325230946.A4641@stratos.net> In-Reply-To: <19990325154529.A76127@corp.au.triax.com>; from Jim Mock on Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 03:45:29PM %2B1100 References: <19990324234014.A66989@stratos.net> <19990325154529.A76127@corp.au.triax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 03:45:29PM +1100, Jim Mock wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 at 23:40:14 +0000, Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > Just wondering -- has anybody tried to keep up to date with the > > ports tree under 3.1? It seems that the ports collection has this > > problem where /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk uses a command called > > `fetch -A'. But, `fetch -A' doesn't work on a default 3.1 system -- > > at least not the RELEASE I downloaded :) > > > > So, is there some sort of configeration value I have to set, or > > should I grab an updated fetch? Editing that file and eliminating > > `-A' is kind of a pain. > > > > Go to http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ and install the 3.1 upgrade kit. > That'll fix it. Thanks for the tip -- guess running a current ports is just as dangerous as a current system :) -Rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990325230946.A4641>