Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:25:18 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error) Message-ID: <20081118192518.286d6f4b@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20081118170826.GA82098@cons.org> References: <20081116045257.2EBEE12E4209@quark.ds9.tecnik93.com> <20081118160528.GA79253@cons.org> <20081118185717.0573f110@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20081118170826.GA82098@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/4dEYvaV8xzEhHn58JCzIasY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500 Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:=20 > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500 > > Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> wrote: > >=20 > > > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=3Dyes > >=20 > > [ .. ] > >=20 > > > QAT@freebsd.org wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:=20 > > > > Hi, > >=20 > > BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least): > >=20 > > From: QAT@FreeBSD.org > > To: cracauer@cons.org > > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > > Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:17 +0300 (EEST) > >=20 > > From: QAT@FreeBSD.org > > To: cracauer@cons.org > > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:06:07 +0300 (EEST) > >=20 > > Did you received those emails ? >=20 > I thought somebody else messed with my port and waited for him/her to > fix it :-) Sorry. My QAT Cc's the maintainer on commit-triggered BotMails. And sends mail only to maintainer for QA-triggered or dependency-triggered BotMails. Anyway, waiting some months for someone to fix your port might be a little to much ;-) More about the way QAT works here: http://t32.tecnik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/ > Which is kind of true, I didn't put these lines into pkg-plist. But > it seems to have been a multi-port sweep. Might be, I didn't check. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/4dEYvaV8xzEhHn58JCzIasY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkki+oUACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeX4ZwCdEZme+LZFvb/fDJ7pItVcRsJd o/YAn2gkmDcoHozHNq/EuioOhQKI93au =5KTg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4dEYvaV8xzEhHn58JCzIasY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081118192518.286d6f4b>