Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:28:41 -0800 From: Glenn Dawson <glenn@antimatter.net> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> Subject: Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060329071519.079c11d8@antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <200603290917.58586@aldan> References: <200603281422.57389.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <200603290026.36453@aldan> <7.0.1.0.2.20060328213006.0764dd48@antimatter.net> <200603290917.58586@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:17 AM 3/29/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:35 am, Glenn Dawson wrote: >= I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only >= problem was with getting the reject message to work properly. >= >= Anyway... >= >= This is what I typically do: >= >= foo@bar.com localaccount1 >= bar@bar.com localaccount2 >= @bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here > >Glenn, this is exactly what I have according to my initial posting >in this thread. Exactly, which is why I didn't think there was a problem with most of it, as re-stated above, and now again, here. >I took the example from sendmail's cf/README: > >= Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: >= >= stol@example.com foo >= hq@example.com bar >= @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks > >Unfortunately, as I write in that initial posting, although it does have >some effect, it does not seem sufficient: > >= I can see the "No spam,thanks" messages logged in the maillog >= (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is >= no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other >= software) What does "other software" refer to in this case? >and some of these messages seem to pass through >= (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). >= >= For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam >= message generates: >= >= Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: ><xgfytxswpcpc@blackalpinist.com>... No spam,thanks >= Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: >from=<example@example.net>, size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, >proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] >= >= Despite the "No spam,thanks" the message was accepted. I don't see anything in the log entries above to indicate that the message was accepted at all. What makes you think that it was? On a general note, you may want to include the delay_checks feature. That will allow sendmail to get most of the info about a message before seeing if it should be rejected or not. If nothing else it allows you to have more meaningful log info on rejected mail. -Glenn >= >= What am I doing wrong? Thanks! > >Yours, > > -mi >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7.0.1.0.2.20060329071519.079c11d8>