Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:37:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> To: grog@lemis.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: dk+@ua.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@smith.net.au, pechter@lakewood.com Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) Message-ID: <199710061437.KAA06974@lakes.dignus.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 01:14:03AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > >> Who can decide on this? Is there a conspiracy behind it? ;-) > > > > Given that I don't particularly *care* about UUCP in the first place, > > I really don't mind what goes into 2.2.5 as far as this is concerned. > > > > Anyone masochistic enough to still use UUCP in this day and age is > > also capable of fixing any breakage that may occur, I think. Go for it. ;) > > The funny thing is, UUCP is no longer the can of worms it used to be. > With Taylor command files, it's quite easy to set up. I wonder why > people want anything else. > > Greg > (If you mean, anything else other than Taylor config files...) Well - you saw my reasons before... mostly because that's how I've done it for many years... but, other than that - you're right. I'm glad to see this going into 2.2.5.... - Dave Rivers -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710061437.KAA06974>