Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:25:48 -0400
From:      "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com>
To:        "Wesley Shields" <wxs@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new reconfig-recursive target for ports
Message-ID:  <8cb6106e0809240925i5d7ad067o21cc680bd800cc9f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080924160633.GC30745@atarininja.org>
References:  <8cb6106e0809240828v3ebe1095w898597fea2d40272@mail.gmail.com> <20080924160633.GC30745@atarininja.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Seems like a rare case where someone would want to re-visit (in this
> manner) options they have already set.  That said, it may come in handy.

Yeah, I figured it can't *hurt* and might come in handy in a few circumstances.

> I think "config-recursive-unconditional" would be a better name as it
> fits better with the "config-recursive" target.  Of course, this is just
> a bikeshed argument so I don't care what it ends up being called.  ;)

I originally named the target config-recursive-force, but the name can
be whatever is most appropriate of course. :)

Josh



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8cb6106e0809240925i5d7ad067o21cc680bd800cc9f>