Date: 07 Sep 1998 10:57:18 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra), jonny@jonny.eng.br, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_bus.c uipc_socket2.c Message-ID: <xzpww7gxpu9.fsf@bilskirnir.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Archie Cobbs's message of "Sun, 6 Sep 1998 18:03:30 -0700 (PDT)" References: <199809070103.SAA13578@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> writes: > John Polstra writes: > > We should never add -Werror to the standard flags. If somebody > > compiles without "-O", the compiler generates spurious warnings. > > These kill the build if -Werror is present. > That's arguable. Anyone who's capable of removing the -O from some > included makefile is capable of removing -Werror from some included > makefile. No. Removing -O is a matter of editing /etc/make.conf, which is well documented as frobbable. Removing -Werror (if we put it in) will probably require editing /usr/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk ostl, which is definitely not frobbable by the uninitiated. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpww7gxpu9.fsf>