Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:19:58 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS Message-ID: <199604011719.TAA06115@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199604011057.UAA14960@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Apr 1, 96 08:57:55 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote: > >Should this become time(9)? > > No, it has very little to do with time or the kernel. clocks(7) would > be better, and half of it is i386-specific so it would need to be split > up. Ok, make it clocks(7). It's not long enough to be split, so it could be kept i386-specific (at least by now). > I don't like section 9. It's far better than no chance to document the kernel at all. We need more people who start documenting the interfaces once they know. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604011719.TAA06115>