Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:36:24 +0200
From:      Olivier Houchard <cognet@ci0.org>
To:        Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Cc:        Kevin Lo <kevlo@freebsd.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 102267 for review
Message-ID:  <20060724163624.GA83205@ci0.org>
In-Reply-To: <44C4F543.3090208@errno.com>
References:  <200607240927.k6O9R8ip054278@repoman.freebsd.org> <44C4F543.3090208@errno.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:28:51AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Kevin Lo wrote:
> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=102267
> > 
> > Change 102267 by kevlo@kevlo_monet on 2006/07/24 09:26:16
> > 
> > 	My bad, back this up. I should commit this into my tree, not into p4.
> 
> Why is it a mistake?  We need to start using a common tree.  I ended up
> creating a sam_avila branch that's derived from arm-devel so I can
> trivially pickup mods that are committed to arm-devel.  I'd like to see
> everyone working on arm code share arm-devel and push their changes
> upstream to there until we can work in CVS.
> 

I agree. Everyone working in his own P4 branch can be a PITA. arm-devel is
"experimental" enough that we don't have to worry about breaking things. 

Olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060724163624.GA83205>