Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:50:45 +0000 (UTC) From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r190075 - head/sys/netipsec Message-ID: <200903191550.n2JFojsB067664@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: vanhu Date: Thu Mar 19 15:50:45 2009 New Revision: 190075 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/190075 Log: Fixed style for some comments Approved by: gnn(mentor) Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c ============================================================================== --- head/sys/netipsec/key.c Thu Mar 19 15:49:30 2009 (r190074) +++ head/sys/netipsec/key.c Thu Mar 19 15:50:45 2009 (r190075) @@ -4161,7 +4161,8 @@ key_flush_sad(time_t now) if (sav->lft_s->addtime != 0 && now - sav->created > sav->lft_s->addtime) { key_sa_chgstate(sav, SADB_SASTATE_DYING); - /* Actually, only send expire message if SA has been used, as it + /* + * Actually, only send expire message if SA has been used, as it * was done before, but should we always send such message, and let IKE * daemon decide if it should be renegociated or not ? * XXX expire message will actually NOT be sent if SA is only used
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903191550.n2JFojsB067664>