Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:55:22 +0100
From:      =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net>
To:        Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it>
Cc:        "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison
Message-ID:  <52E79AAA.2000606@wasikowski.net>
In-Reply-To: <CADfWLe=t3JZr2OKy2SNspyuxiA5vp=AqL%2BytXvJSikmt-=FvLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADfWLe=zOc2CYRXf8ZuG4uZqN%2BMBck4y1JoDcmrX--JqAgDSQw@mail.gmail.com>	<52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net> <CADfWLe=t3JZr2OKy2SNspyuxiA5vp=AqL%2BytXvJSikmt-=FvLQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 2014-01-28 12:52, Andrea Brancatelli pisze:

> OK, I changed that, thanks for your feedback, my assumption was
> something like "with bhyve it took the 106% of the time it took with
> VMWare", but probably the approach of "bhyve being 6% slower" is clearer.

I think so too. Thank you for testing! :)

-- 
best regards,
Lukasz Wasikowski



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52E79AAA.2000606>