Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:58:29 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, freebsd Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html Message-ID: <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: > This website should be brushed up or taken offline! > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. > > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html I think this one would better look like list of major features with os comparison, like: = Networking = * IPv6: major support, best stack around. * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). = Data storage = * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has dynamic disks since XP (?features). = SMP = * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like DragonflyBSD and QNX). If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD over other systems. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5BEF65.2010502>