Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:41:21 -0600 From: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: "Alexander Leidinger" <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: proc/filesystems implementation Message-ID: <790a9fff0612150441m55f4754iab046ff97f5096de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061215112152.zo19clk4ggkck4c8@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <790a9fff0612140401h7bf0bdb0idb1590120ae95e3f@mail.gmail.com> <20061215112152.zo19clk4ggkck4c8@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/15/06, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > Like Roman I'm eager to know which software uses this. Unlike him I > don't think (yet) it doesn't make sense without a translation table. > If the list is just presented to an user we don't need a translation. > If it is used to do something we may need a translation (but only for > those FS which have a compatible structure, like cd9660 or extfs, but > not for ufs, which is UFS2 for us and "I don't know but possibly UFS1" > on Linux). > The only thing that I'm aware of that uses it is 3 scripts in the LTP: # grep -l "proc/filesystem" */* testscripts/autofs1.sh testscripts/autofs4.sh testscripts/exportfs.sh currently we don't run the tests that use these scripts. The first two scripts check if the autofs is available, while the last one checks if the requested filesystem is available. NOTE: the scripts do more than this check for the filesystem. It does uses a translation table, but I haven't been able to verify all of the filesystem names against the names used on a linux system (i.e cd9660 -> iso9660(?)). Scot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0612150441m55f4754iab046ff97f5096de>