Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:39:14 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Alan Cox <alc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_int.h Message-ID: <20050617063914.GA1097@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <200506161706.j5GH6YgW038252@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200506161706.j5GH6YgW038252@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:06:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > alc 2005-06-16 17:06:34 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/vm uma_int.h > Log: > Increase UMA_BOOT_PAGES to prevent a crash during initialization. See > http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42AD8270.8060906 for a detailed > description of the crash. Today, I finally got a traceback of my insta-reboots after marius' atkbd commit (2005-06-10 20:56:38 UTC) and it was exactly this same traceback. Funny that such an innocuous commit started causing my 'i386' workstation to panic. We were that much on the edge of having enough UMA_BOOT_PAGES? Is 48 enough? It looks like the code attempts to help the poor user out: sys/vm/uma_core.c:911: panic("UMA: Increase UMA_BOOT_PAGES"); But why wasn't that being triggered in Eric Anderson's case and mine? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050617063914.GA1097>