Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:40:33 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@tcbug.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj port Message-ID: <20031217204033.GB7146@ns1.tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <20031217233414.GA658@arthur.nitro.dk> References: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org> <20031217233414.GA658@arthur.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:34:21AM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2003.12.17 14:15:38 +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > I noticed that there is now a couple of new docproj ports, one with jadetex > > and one without...I'm wondering if the fdp should be updated to reflect the > > new ports, as the old docproj port appears to be depreciated, or at the very > > least no longer needed. > > The two "new" ports docproj-jadetex and docproj-nojadetex are just > metaports that set the JADETEX make variable to either "yes" or "no" and > then include the docproj port. The docproj port is not depreciated, two > to meta ports are just there to make it simpler to install the docproj > port. Great. > If you think the FDP should tell people about the two "new" ports you > chould submit a patch :-). > -- > > > Simon L. Nielsen > FreeBSD Documentation Team I'll have it submitted by tomorrow. :) Josh Paetzel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217204033.GB7146>