Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 10:29:42 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and onwards Message-ID: <418E5B86.1070100@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <87mzxtvaza.fsf@beeblebrox.rfc1149.net> References: <20041107093907.GK79646@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20130.1099820551@critter.freebsd.dk> <87mzxtvaza.fsf@beeblebrox.rfc1149.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Samuel Tardieu wrote: >>>>>>"PHK" == Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > > > PHK> For better or worse, we're stuck with CVS for the forseeable > PHK> future and there are so many other ways to better use the huge > PHK> amount of developer time it would cost to replace it. > > I've never proposed to replace CVS with anything else. I proposed to > replace Perforce by GNU Arch. > > Sam Proposing it is easy. Demonstrating that is has benefits that are enough for poeple to change their existing work habits is hard. SCM doesn't change be decree, except at companies that don't care about their engineers. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?418E5B86.1070100>