Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:07:08 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Subject: Re: Linux executable picks up FreeBSD library over linux one and breaks Message-ID: <20071213100708.37716700@peedub.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4760A7FE.9070409@chuckr.org> References: <1196470143.4750af7f6accf@webmail.rawbw.com> <4752F825.8020505@chuckr.org> <20071203144159.irjelm2c0c8o8csw@webmail.leidinger.net> <47544B5A.9080903@chuckr.org> <20071205122123.phwu6uh7jksgcwk8@webmail.leidinger.net> <4760A7FE.9070409@chuckr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:33:18 -0500 Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> wrote: [lots of discussion snipped] > I really wish that ports management would go on the record and make a > definite ruling, that all linux images should install to the > /compat/linux tree. If this would be the case, then nI would myself go > about fixing the horde of software that violates this. I said horde, > and I sure meant it. > I agree with this whole-heartedly. Interestingly, there's already a LINUXBASE which points at /compat/linux. Why all Linux-based ports aren't required to or automatically use this is a mystery to me. Just my 2 Euro-cents. -- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213100708.37716700>