Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:04:00 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) Message-ID: <20060829150400.739ae7d2@localhost> In-Reply-To: <op.te0bpbbu8527sy@guido.klop.ws> References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060828161538.GI89053@vision.anyware> <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> <op.te0bpbbu8527sy@guido.klop.ws>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:45:01 +0200
"Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> wrote:
> Maybe it is possible to repocopy eclipse to eclipse31. And change the
> depending ports for the new location.
> Just an idea. Don't know how much work it is.
or, given that most ports that depend on 3.1.2 wont work out of the box with
3.2 , just call this one eclipse32 ?
I remember seeing an email on this list suggesting against doing any of
this.... but IMVHO, is better to have both out there and then have a reason to
upgrade all the plugins ... otherwise I can see we may have a gap when we have
java/eclipse (3.2) but no compatible plugins available yet....
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ;
fsck ; umount ; sleep
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829150400.739ae7d2>