Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:37:43 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: run interrupt driven hooks: still waiting for xpt_config
Message-ID:  <20090712203354.P245@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090712194547.9e573116.ubm@u-boot-man.de>
References:  <20090708192642.6b30167e.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090708225048.ec9d9cad.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090710200352.72ef6804.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090711205837.46b11405.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090711222304.fc99056a.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090712122316.4f63fc62.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090712181034.93811d03.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20090712194547.9e573116.ubm@u-boot-man.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:10:34 +0200
> Marc "UBM" Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> wrote:
>
>
>> I've got it narrowed down between "2009.06.30.06.00.00" and today. A
>> kernel with the "old" date boots, a freshly csupped and compiled
>> kernel hangs with the usual symptoms (waiting for interrupt driven
>> hooks).
>>
>> I'll try csupping to just before the big cam commit to see if there is
>> any connection. When I said earlier that I was not running with the
>> ahci patch, I was partly wrong. I did not have device ahci in my
>> kernel config file nor had it loaded as a module, but I had the patch
>> applied.
>
> "2009.07.09.06.00.00" fixes the problem.
> Could it be that there are some subtle interactions in the cam
> subsystem that are stirred by the recent mega-commit?

Just for the record, I have seen xpt message like:

   run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config

with aac on 7.1-STABLE and 7.2-STABLE already but only under certain
conditions.
Under some conditions the same kernel booted while with other ones it
didn't.

/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                      The greatest risk is not taking one.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090712203354.P245>