Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:54:40 -0600 From: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Do SpamAssassin spamd and Obspamd play nicely together? Message-ID: <20080205095440.94936n0t6ybjhyas@intranet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20080204220126.GA25963@eos.sc1.parodius.com> References: <20080204141316.76512pfm25is8i68@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080204220126.GA25963@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:13:16PM -0600, eculp wrote: >> I have sa-spamd running and I just installed obspamd or pfspamd what ever >> it should be called and the spamd log file seems taken over by spamasassin. >> Are there any other conflicts or changes that should be made to use both. > > Funny, since I indirectly touched on this problem many moons ago when > writing a document on issues we encountered when attempting to migrate > from postgrey to OpenBSD spamd. See section "Issues with OpenBSD spamd > on FreeBSD": > > http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/openbsd-spamd.txt Jeremy, Sorry, but I have one other question. Are you still using obspamd on the machines you set up when you wrote the above link? Your reasons on why or why not would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again for the information, ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080205095440.94936n0t6ybjhyas>