Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:19:54 -0800 From: "greg" <greg@fqdn.com> To: "Tony Landells" <ahl@austclear.com.au>, <greg@nova.fqdn.com> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: NAT and keep-state issue. Message-ID: <OHEFKMMEEIPHNLFHPMMLCEIHCAAA.greg@fqdn.com> In-Reply-To: <200102212140.IAA25168@tungsten.austclear.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sory about the lack of lf/cr. Ok what your seeing there is the rule set *after* I had removed the check state rule in an effort to problem solve. 3 minutes befor I sent that letter this rule existed: 1055 check-state (befor the divert rule) As a note I also tried moving it to the next rule after the divert(1065). xl0 is the internal NIC fxp0 and fxp1 face the internet. Thanks for taking the time to look at this Tony. Greg >Please keep your lines a bit shorter--a couple of them were, um, quite long... > >I may be going blind, but I can't see where you're doing a "check-state"... >Without that you'll never check the dynamic rules. >Cheers, >Tony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OHEFKMMEEIPHNLFHPMMLCEIHCAAA.greg>