Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:54:12 +0700 From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation. Message-ID: <20030628075412.GD74123@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0306251624010.3793-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <20030625232045.GB92939@iclub.nsu.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0306251624010.3793-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:24:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > btw I know of two projects whose goal is IP stack virtualization for jail. > > Virtual IP stack (as well as virtualized sysvipc with separate > > memory zones) can be quite useful. Can provide two solutions? > > > > - with shared memory zone (for those who want "light" version) > > - with separate memory zones (for people who want to keep > > sysvipc fully separated, i.e. one user can't exhaust all sysvipc resources > > and make sysvipc unusable for second user) > > Is either of these projects Marco Zec's project? yes. The other is Riccardo Scandariato work. Both were discussed on -net about a month ago. /fjoe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030628075412.GD74123>